Economic Recovery, Free Enterprise, and Keystone...
The Enviros Are Winning|
February 12, 2008
Last week as the nation's attention was focused on all politics, all the time, the
environmentalists made major headway. Significant headway. Right under our noses.
Politicians, celebrities, businesses, scientists, bureaucrats, farmers, cities,
the UN, our own government and even religious orders are accepting and validating
the largely unproven concept of man-made global warming.
Corporations are jumping on board
as they roll out credit
designed to cash in on people's worry about global warming. Allstate
now cites global warming as the reason they
hiked their rates by a whopping 42%
Even farmers are cashing
by selling carbon credits to large corporations. Easy money. Cash for
a 'promise' to cut down on 'carbon footprints'. Environmentalists are using the
threat of global warming
(for the first time in history) to
list species on the Endangered Species list.
Cities are starting to get in on this act
, by increasingly advocating a
federal 'carbon tax'.
And lets not forget politicians. "Politicians using tragedy to advance an agenda
is a tried and true strategy. Paint the idea green and a natural crisis becomes
political fodder." Just last week,
Sen. Kerry blamed the tornadoes
that recently caused 55 deaths, on global
If a disaster is caused by global warming then the focus is off, say, government
screw-ups. The added advantage is the 'guilt by proxy' that Americans are made to
feel for not having 'invested' enough to halt this crisis. What a beautiful setup.
Screw up, (levees in New Orleans, for example) blame it on something else and get tons of cash to boot.
Lest I forget, did you know your tax dollars are now being
used by politicians
to reduce their "carbon footprints?" (This is called 'virtue
on the cheap.')
Global warming is rapidly gaining the status of a religion. Northwestern University just published an article entitled
God and Global Warming: Religion and Science Unite.
stated that some religions have conceded that global warming and religion are similar
because "both have moral components." This was followed by the Church of England
urging people to
cut down on carbon
, rather than chocolate, for Lent.
The implications of global warming as religion
are dangerous. Religion is based faith. If global warming is associated with religion,
the result will be increasing
acceptance of this disputed premise on 'faith.' In other words,
blindly and without question.
Consider: If global warming is indeed a man-made crisis, then it follows that it can and should be solved by
man. But only with lots of money. Money thrown blindly in the pot to be used by politicians,
businesses, the UN and everyone who has jumped on board the global warming bandwagon.
Initial costs are app. $7,000 per family in the U.S. The UN has asked for $20 trillion
over 20 years to address this crisis.
Even Bush has signed on, in favor of allocating $2 billion of our
What this represents is the most massive assault on capitalism ever engineered.
A perfect way to 'level the playing field' thus putting big, bad America on the
same level as third world countries. This is the real agenda. Bill Clinton
as much as admitted this, as he said in a
speech in Denver
last week, "We just have to slow our economy and cut back
on our greenhouse gas emissions cause we have to 'save the planet' for our grandchildren."
Right now, India is experiencing the
largest cold wave
in four decades. China is suffering their
in a century, stranding millions just last week.
is experiencing the coldest temperatures in eight years.
As you're reading this, Northern Minn. is experiencing
a record low
of more than minus 40 degrees.
For all the true believers out there, ask youselves: If global warming is indeed
a man-made crisis, why hasn't anyone claimed the $200,000 offered
by Steve Milloy of JunkScience.com
. All they have to do is prove man is causing
global warming and that its a bad thing.
No matter how thin the pancake, there are always two sides. If global warming is valid science, why the push to stifle debate? Why are we not being allowed to hear the other side? Why has a prominent Canadian scientist just
for dissenting politicians. Is it just a coincidence that
proposed solutions for global warming mirror policies the left has been pushing
Like the man said who got caught by his wife in bed with another woman, "Who are
you going to believe? Me or your own eyes?"
Support RightBias with your advertising dollars