The Intellectual Poverty Law Center|
July 7, 2014
When I was a graduate student, I had great admiration for the Southern Poverty
Law Center. In 1989, I took a graduate seminar in race relations and learned all
about how the SPLC helped shut down the KKK in the South - thus expediting the
end of the practice of lynching. Because of their hard work, the targeted murder
of blacks is currently confined to abortion clinics funded by leftist
organizations yet to be defined as "hate groups."
Sadly, the once-great SPLC has abandoned its focus on fighting groups that
terrorize the black community. Otherwise, they would be doing something about
Planned Parenthood. Instead, the SPLC has turned its efforts towards promoting
intellectual terrorism against all opponents of the American Left. Now,
virtually everyone who disagrees with SPLC politics is branded a hate group and
lumped together with groups like the KKK.
Recently, I learned that the now out of control SPLC has characterized the
Alliance Defending Freedom as a hate group. Their reason for the
characterization was simply that the ADF opposes efforts of the LGBT community
to impose its agenda on those who disagree with them for religious reasons. Some
examples of ADF activism in this area follow:
-Representing Bakers. The ADF has represented bakers who have refused to
bake cakes for homosexual “wedding” ceremonies. The SPLC has a problem with this
- suggesting that siding with the bakers constitutes anti-gay bigotry. In fact,
they liken it to the mid-20th Century practice of denying blacks seats at
counters in segregated cafes. This is a poor analogy, indeed. In fact, the SPLC
position is morally consistent with saying that a black baker should be forced
to bake cakes for a fundraising dinner for a white supremacist group. Of course,
the moral inconsistency is a reflection of the fact that SPLC is dedicated to
identity politics, not to principles of freedom of association and freedom of
-Representing Photographers. ADF has also defended photographers who
refuse to photograph homosexual "weddings." This was also seen as hateful by the
SPLC. Imagine what the SPLC would do if a black photographer had been forced to
take pictures at a Klan rally. Would the SPLC defend the photographer or the
-Representing Christian Student Organizations. You don't really have to
rely on a Klan hypothetical when trying to expose SPLC hypocrisy on the issue of
freedom of association. Back in the 1950s, Klansmen really did try to join the
NAACP in order to destroy them by changing their statements of belief.
Now, homosexual activists have stolen the old Klan tactic and used it on campus
Christian organizations. And the SPLC is right there cheering them on!
Now that some of the Christian groups have gone to the ADF for protection
against these Klan-inspired tactics, the SPLC has come out against the ADF -
even characterizing their efforts to defend Christian group autonomy as part of
a "sharp record of anti-gay bigotry." Switching back to hypothetical mode,
imagine that the ADF decided to defend the NAACP from Klansmen seeking to invade
the group and change their belief structure. Would ADF be guilty of establishing
a "sharp record of anti-Klan bigotry"?
Indeed, highlighting SPLC hypocrisy is like shooting fish in a barrel because
the organization has no consistent set of moral principles. That is, unless you
characterize defending Leftists no matter what they do as a "moral principal."
Truth be told, the SPLC has become much less of a defensive organization in
recent years. These days, they seem to remain on the offensive with this tired
business of stigmatizing groups that hold fairly mainstream views as "hate
groups." The ADF is but one of their many targets. Others include the American
Family Association (AFA,), the Family Research Council (FRC), and World Net
It is worth asking what Martin Luther King would think about the AFA or FRC if
he were alive today. Would he brazenly lump them together with the KKK and the
Aryan Nation? Of course he wouldn’t. In fact, King would probably be among their
It takes real moral bankruptcy to fail to grasp the offensiveness of such brazen
moral equivalence. One could only hope that the moral bankruptcy of the SPLC
will lead to actual bankruptcy as donors wake up and turn away from the practice
of subsidizing their blatant hypocrisy. Or maybe members of the ADF could invade
the group and reorganize the SPLCs core beliefs, thus making them consistent.
The core problem with the SPLC is that they simply don't understand the
definition of hate speech - the thing they so enthusiastically claim to be
eradicating. In reality, hate speech is simply speech that liberals hate because
they lack the intelligence required to offer a rebuttal.
Given that the SPLC hates an increasing amount of main stream speech, it is hard
to avoid characterizing them as a hate group. Their battle against hate groups
would best be advanced by closing their own doors and throwing a giant going out
of business party. If they ever do, I will be there to take pictures and bake
them a cake.
Please, don’t laugh. Queerer things have happened before.
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina
Wilmington and author of
Letters to a Young Progressive: How To Avoid Wasting
Your Life Protesting Things You Don't Understand.